01 / Data model
Define systems of record and required fields.
Source
KG-NET / ERP integrations
Planning, design and technology are considered together. Scope and price follow your actual requirements.

ERP integrations
Three perspectives on your project. Scroll through the process or select a step.
Define systems of record and required fields.
SourceAlign identifiers, status and formats.
InterfaceTest retries and conflicts.
DestinationWORKING TOGETHER
Before work begins, we agree goals, content, responsibilities and integrations. You know what is included and what needs a separate plan.
Structure, design and function are reviewed in clear stages. Decisions follow your requirements and feedback.
The agreed scope defines access, guidance and an understandable operation and maintenance plan. Ongoing support is agreed explicitly.
ERP integrations: Keep stock, product and order data consistent across your store and ERP.
Products, customers and orders need clear systems of record. We define ownership, mapping and synchronisation rules, including conflicts, so a connection does not simply spread errors between systems.
ERP integration needs clear data ownership. Product codes, stock, prices and orders receive explicit mappings and update directions. Conflicts, retries and missing values are planned. A failed transfer must not create duplicate orders. Field mappings and test cases are reviewed with responsible staff before live exchange; assumptions about external systems must not silently become business rules.
Define systems of record and required fields.
Align identifiers, status and formats.
Test retries and conflicts.
We discuss how your business actually works before specifying individual features. Dependencies, responsibilities and the agreed scope are documented. Decisions are discussed using actual pages, tasks or data flows. Questions, materials and approvals are coordinated with an accountable contact. During handover we clarify what your team can maintain and which technical work requires a separate service. You can see what was agreed and where an additional decision is needed.
20 / QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
We review documentation, permissions, data fields and operational limits. A stable supported API is preferable to unclear access.
Approval points are explicit. Purchases, sensitive changes and payments do not proceed unchecked on an AI decision.
Errors are recorded and retries limited. Last known data carries a timestamp and missing data is not invented.
Unique event identifiers and defined state changes help handle retries safely. Typical failure scenarios are tested.
Yes, if scanners, identifiers and the target system align. We clarify whether a code represents a product, batch or process.
In bounded tasks such as suggestions or classification whose quality can be assessed. Data access and human review stay explicit.
Tokens and keys belong in protected server-side storage. They are not exposed as browser data or unprotected text fields.
Modules and documented interfaces limit dependencies. Extensions are checked against the data model, permissions and existing workflows.
We clarify the audience, existing systems, responsible people and intended outcome, then agree the scope.
Scope, integrations, content, licences and support are considered separately. You receive an individual offer before delivery starts.
After discovery and prioritisation we agree milestones. Approvals, access and external dependencies influence dates.
We agree which text, images and data you provide. Access should use roles, invitations or limited tokens wherever possible.
Yes, subject to a technical review. We plan changes, backups and rollback paths to keep the transition controlled.
Questions are collected in the project. Extensions get a defined scope and approval before additional implementation.
We agree concrete test cases and responsible people. Open issues are documented and release follows the agreed approval.
Handover can include training, documentation and defined access rights. The scope and format are specified in the offer.
Support, updates and response times are agreed separately, making internal and KG-NET responsibilities clear.
We limit access and review data flows, retention and processor arrangements. Legal approval remains with the controller and their advisers.
We work with businesses in Austria, Germany, Switzerland and Serbia. Language, responsibilities and actual market needs are agreed together.
We agree verifiable goals and identify the data source. Without connected measurement there are no invented metrics or guaranteed outcomes.
Depending on your project, we align this service with related areas. Content, technology and responsibilities should fit together. Discuss the interfaces and actual scope you need with us:
THE NEXT STEP
Tell us what you want to change. We will clarify goals, scope and the right approach, with an individual proposal.
Ilija Benjak
Völkermarkter Straße 280
9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
Austria